Tags

19th century 20th century academia africa al qaeda america architecture art biography business christianity economics emotions ethics europe everyday existence gender germany globalization government health history ideology islam justice law literature media studies medicine musicology new york city philosophy polemics political science power presidency public policy race religion rights science sexuality social mobility sociology sovereignty state united states urbanism urbanity violence

race racism radio rand paul rape rauschenberg robert rawls john ray man reading reagan ronald real estate reason red-cockaded woodpecker reformation refugees regulation rehnquist william hubbs reischauer edwin religion renaissance representation reproduction reptiles republican party research methodology resistance revere paul revolution revson charles rhetoric richter gerhard rico riefenstahl leni rights rist pipilotti roberts john robots roddick anita roman empire romanticism roosevelt franklin d roosevelt theodore root john wellborn rouse james royal dutch shell royko mike ruscha ed russia rutledge john rwanda

[M]odern art still commonly refers to a rather narrow range of meaning and scope. It basically focuses on developments in Paris (Impressionism etc.) in the nineteenth century, and to selected Euro-American movements in the twentieth century (Cubism, Abstract Expressionism etc). But if we understand modernity as a socially transformative condition that was in force across much of the world from the nineteenth century on, how are we to understand artistic practices that were associated with these momentous changes?

Iftikhar Dadi,
Interview of March 26, 2012

The two world wars of the twentieth century were a product of the dislocations brought about of modernization in an environment where great power competition and the drive for hegemony were conducted primarily by violent means. Now that this era has passed in Europe and is receding in much of the Pacific rim, and hegemony achieved by force is no longer considered a legitimate ambition, the security requirements and fears of great powers should decline.

Richard Ned Lebow,
Interview of October 4, 2010