Tags

19th century 20th century academia africa america architecture art biography business christianity economics emotions environment ethics europe everyday existence gender germany globalization government health history ideology islam justice law literature media studies medicine musicology new york city philosophy polemics political science power presidency public policy race religion rights science sexuality social mobility sociology sovereignty state united states urbanism urbanity violence

race racism radio rand paul rape rational choice rationality rauschenberg robert rawls john ray man reading reagan ronald real estate reason red-cockaded woodpecker reformation refugees regulation rehnquist william hubbs reischauer edwin religion renaissance rene descartes representation reproduction reptiles republican party research methodology resilience resistance revere paul revolution revson charles rhetoric richter gerhard rico riefenstahl leni rights rist pipilotti roberts john robots roddick anita roman empire romanticism roosevelt franklin d roosevelt theodore root john wellborn rouse james royal dutch shell royko mike ruscha ed russia rutledge john rwanda

The dominant premise in evolution and economics is that a person is being loyal to natural law if he or she attends to self’s interest and welfare before being concerned with the needs and demands of family or community. The public does not realize that this statement is not an established scientific principle but an ethical preference. Nonetheless, this belief has created a moral confusion among North Americans and Europeans because the evolution of our species was accompanied by the disposition to worry about kin and the collectives to which one belongs.

Jerome Kagan,
Interview of September 17, 2009

[T]he Holocaust transformed our whole way of thinking about war and heroism. War is no longer a proving ground for heroism in the same way it used to be. Instead, war now is something that we must avoid at all costs—because genocides often take place under the cover of war. We are no longer all potential soldiers (though we are that too), but we are all potential victims of the traumas war creates. This, at least, is one important development in the way Western populations envision war, even if it does not always predominate in the thinking of our political leaders.

Carolyn J. Dean,
Interview of February 01, 2011