Tags

19th century 20th century academia africa america anthropology architecture art biography business christianity economics emotions environment ethics europe everyday existence gender germany globalization government health history ideology islam justice law literature media studies medicine musicology new york city philosophy polemics political science power presidency public policy race religion rights science sexuality social mobility sociology sovereignty state united states urbanism violence

eakins thomas eames charles earth eastern europe ecological economics ecology economic crisis economic history economic policy economics economy ecosystem edelstein david edinburgh education egan timothy egypt einstein albert elections electrons eliott t s elizabeth i ellington duke ellison ralph elso juan francisco embryos emergency management emin pasha emotions empire endangered species endangered species act energy engineering england enlai zhou enlightenment entertainment entrepreneurship environment environmental crisis environmentalism equal rights amendment equality ethics ethnicity ethnography etzler john eugenics euro europe european commission european court of justice european monetary union european union evans ben evans walker evans-wentz walter everyday everyday existence evolution evolutionary anthropology evolutionary psychology exercise existence existentialism eyes

[T]he Holocaust transformed our whole way of thinking about war and heroism. War is no longer a proving ground for heroism in the same way it used to be. Instead, war now is something that we must avoid at all costs—because genocides often take place under the cover of war. We are no longer all potential soldiers (though we are that too), but we are all potential victims of the traumas war creates. This, at least, is one important development in the way Western populations envision war, even if it does not always predominate in the thinking of our political leaders.

Carolyn J. Dean,
Interview of February 01, 2011

The dominant premise in evolution and economics is that a person is being loyal to natural law if he or she attends to self’s interest and welfare before being concerned with the needs and demands of family or community. The public does not realize that this statement is not an established scientific principle but an ethical preference. Nonetheless, this belief has created a moral confusion among North Americans and Europeans because the evolution of our species was accompanied by the disposition to worry about kin and the collectives to which one belongs.

Jerome Kagan,
Interview of September 17, 2009