Tags

19th century 20th century academia africa america anthropology architecture art biography business christianity economics emotions environment ethics europe everyday existence gender germany globalization government health history ideology islam justice law literature media studies medicine musicology new york city philosophy polemics political science power presidency public policy race religion rights science sexuality social mobility sociology sovereignty state united states urbanism violence

babbitt bruce ballard j g bamiyan buddha statues bancroft edward bangladesh banking baring charles barney charles barnum p t barricade bartholdi frederic auguste batman baudrillard jean bauer catherine bbc beauty behavior belzoni giovanni batista ben-levi benzodiazepines berlin bernstein leonard bertolucci bernardo bible bildungsroman biodiversity bioethics biography biological warfare biology biomimicry biopolitics biotechnology bioterrorism black studies blavatsky madame bloomberg michael blume judy bodin jean body bohemia bolshevik party bond james borges jorge luis bork robert bourdieu pierre bourke-white margaret bouteflika abdelaziz boys bram christopher branding britain british empire brock isaac brooklyn brown helen gurley brunhild buckley william buddhism buddhist temple massacre buffet warren bureaucracy burke william bush george h bush george w business business history

[T]he Holocaust transformed our whole way of thinking about war and heroism. War is no longer a proving ground for heroism in the same way it used to be. Instead, war now is something that we must avoid at all costs—because genocides often take place under the cover of war. We are no longer all potential soldiers (though we are that too), but we are all potential victims of the traumas war creates. This, at least, is one important development in the way Western populations envision war, even if it does not always predominate in the thinking of our political leaders.

Carolyn J. Dean,
Interview of February 01, 2011

The dominant premise in evolution and economics is that a person is being loyal to natural law if he or she attends to self’s interest and welfare before being concerned with the needs and demands of family or community. The public does not realize that this statement is not an established scientific principle but an ethical preference. Nonetheless, this belief has created a moral confusion among North Americans and Europeans because the evolution of our species was accompanied by the disposition to worry about kin and the collectives to which one belongs.

Jerome Kagan,
Interview of September 17, 2009