Project Europe book offers a radically different
interpretation of the European Union’s history. It shifts the focus away from the
motives and driving forces of European integration to the concrete effects and
results for the lives of people in the member states and beyond. In doing so,
it challenges and deconstructs the myths surrounding the establishment and
evolution of the European Community (EC) as the predecessors of today’s EU. Project
Europe also assesses the various forms of criticism the EU frequently finds
itself confronted with. The book covers the period from the first institutional
attempts to build Europe in the second half of the 1940s until the end of the Cold
War. It also discusses the lessons we can learn from this past for debates
about the EU today.
In order to understand today’s EU, we need to revisit its
history. Project Europe explains why a rather narrow organization that
initially comprised just six Western European states is today so frequently
equated with Europe as a whole. There was no single blueprint behind this
process, but a complex web of different and often contradictory trends. European
integration has fundamentally changed over the course of its history, and its
undeniable importance today would have appeared improbable just a few decades
ago. Many of the aspects we project back onto the early years in fact only took
shape much more recently. Particularly the period of turmoil during the 1970s
and 1980s helped to promote the European Community into the central
European project. Incrementally, a new institutional reality arose, that
subsequently also transformed the political systems of its member states.
The EC was born with a focus on economic integration, and to
this day, the EU cannot deny its economic DNA. This business-centered
capitalist logic was one of the main reasons why the EC were able to become the
dominant forum of international cooperation in Europe at the time. Seeing the
world through an economic lens decisively shaped the EC and continues to do so
today—for better and worse.
That said, the effects of European integration on people’s
lives remained mostly indirect and rather limited until the 1990s and 2000s. This
explains why the relationship between citizens and the EC was often brittle.
The results of European integration only became fully evident decades later,
and this gap between decisions and effects explains many of the challenges and
crises the EU has to deal with in our own times.
[T]he Holocaust transformed our whole way of thinking about war and heroism. War is no longer a proving ground for heroism in the same way it used to be. Instead, war now is something that we must avoid at all costs—because genocides often take place under the cover of war. We are no longer all potential soldiers (though we are that too), but we are all potential victims of the traumas war creates. This, at least, is one important development in the way Western populations envision war, even if it does not always predominate in the thinking of our political leaders.Carolyn J. Dean, Interview of February 01, 2011
The dominant premise in evolution and economics is that a person is being loyal to natural law if he or she attends to self’s interest and welfare before being concerned with the needs and demands of family or community. The public does not realize that this statement is not an established scientific principle but an ethical preference. Nonetheless, this belief has created a moral confusion among North Americans and Europeans because the evolution of our species was accompanied by the disposition to worry about kin and the collectives to which one belongs.Jerome Kagan, Interview of September 17, 2009
In a nutshell
Project Europe book offers a radically different interpretation of the European Union’s history. It shifts the focus away from the motives and driving forces of European integration to the concrete effects and results for the lives of people in the member states and beyond. In doing so, it challenges and deconstructs the myths surrounding the establishment and evolution of the European Community (EC) as the predecessors of today’s EU. Project Europe also assesses the various forms of criticism the EU frequently finds itself confronted with. The book covers the period from the first institutional attempts to build Europe in the second half of the 1940s until the end of the Cold War. It also discusses the lessons we can learn from this past for debates about the EU today.
In order to understand today’s EU, we need to revisit its history. Project Europe explains why a rather narrow organization that initially comprised just six Western European states is today so frequently equated with Europe as a whole. There was no single blueprint behind this process, but a complex web of different and often contradictory trends. European integration has fundamentally changed over the course of its history, and its undeniable importance today would have appeared improbable just a few decades ago. Many of the aspects we project back onto the early years in fact only took shape much more recently. Particularly the period of turmoil during the 1970s and 1980s helped to promote the European Community into the central European project. Incrementally, a new institutional reality arose, that subsequently also transformed the political systems of its member states.
The EC was born with a focus on economic integration, and to this day, the EU cannot deny its economic DNA. This business-centered capitalist logic was one of the main reasons why the EC were able to become the dominant forum of international cooperation in Europe at the time. Seeing the world through an economic lens decisively shaped the EC and continues to do so today—for better and worse.
That said, the effects of European integration on people’s lives remained mostly indirect and rather limited until the 1990s and 2000s. This explains why the relationship between citizens and the EC was often brittle. The results of European integration only became fully evident decades later, and this gap between decisions and effects explains many of the challenges and crises the EU has to deal with in our own times.