Robert Wuthnow

 

On his book Remaking the Heartland: Middle America since the 1950s

Cover Interview of April 27, 2011

Lastly

I came away with an optimistic appraisal of what is happening in this part of America’s heartland.

To be sure, population is not growing like it is on either coast.  Jobs are often scarce and rising fuel prices make long commutes difficult.  Children grow up and seldom return.

Yet, the region’s contribution to the national economy remains undiminished.  Effective adaption is happening everywhere one looks—from GPS-guided tractors, to wind energy farms, to bioscience laboratories.  The heart of the heartland is beating strong.

Much of the reason lies in the enduring social institutions the region’s residents built from the 1870s to the 1950s.  These included an effective system of county and township government, and especially of primary and secondary schools.

By the 1920s, the Middle West had become known as the “education belt.”  Over the next half century, it added a large network of colleges and universities, pioneered the nation’s aviation industry, adapted to international markets, and rebuilt its infrastructure.  Not surprisingly, the people I talked to expressed pride in their communities and voiced cautious optimism about their place in America’s future.

Is there a policy message in all this?  Perhaps.

Pundits describe the heartland as a hotbed of anti-government fiscal conservatism.  And that may be true.

But over the past century and a half government has played an enormously important role in the heartland.  Before the pioneers arrived, the government surveyors, land agents, and cavalry prepared the way.  County and township governments formed, regulated and taxed the use of land, and supervised the orderly development of primary and secondary schools.  World War Two filled the region with ammunition depots and military bases that gave fledgling companies their start and created lasting infrastructure for new businesses.

The heartland is currently involved in the nation’s struggle to rebuild its infrastructure and avoid further economic catastrophe while paying heed to the demands of social conservatives and Tea Party activists.

It may be tempting to think of the heartland as a kind of hinterland, still populated with indigent hayseeds too poor to take advantage of progress in the nation’s great cities.  But to think that would be a big mistake.


© 2011 Robert Wuthnow